Newtonian mechanics consider relative motions (translational motions or rotational motions with respect to a reference point). Uniform motion takes place when no net forces exert on the body.
It is often said that Quantum Mechanics comes into play when the scale of the elements of the system is microscopic. This restricted view hides the fact that the fundamental difference between CM and QM is not a difference of scale but a difference of describing the objects and their motions. CM focuses on objects that are located at points and on their relative motions. QM focuses on objects whose orientations evolve absolutely. This allows us to approach QM intuitively, reasoning on how arrow-like objects would behave in real life.
I'm trying to develop a modest principles classical approach its a bit messy but I'd love some feedback on what direction to take.
ReplyDeletehttp://cdgrea.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pY-abpXVdtWhJUid8slMLqP5x0M_LXMIKBHxbNFohyjPMlxAqCG4wnXmTnr2OwW6JyloumNjpACjZCgpS2oerug/Modest%20principle%20theory%20of%20everything%20BJ.mht
Hello B.
ReplyDeleteI didn't manage to retrieve your file. Maybe you could send it by mail: materion at free dot fr.
Arjen
ahhh, I see why you like the Pilot Wave interpretation. Keep up the good posts! The trick becomes, what kind of ideas this interpretation generates.
ReplyDeleteBest Regards,
Yummypasta
Hi Eldon,
ReplyDeleteWell you must have got a bright insight because I didn't mention pilot-waves in this post. But yes, I like the idea of pilot-waves because they are complementary to particle motion: wave-particle duality.
Arjen
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete