tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-382677439644973005.post7967327493431533678..comments2023-09-24T17:08:13.142+02:00Comments on Physics intuitions: A Pythagorean relation for any triangle?Arjen Dijksmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09450431291713605237noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-382677439644973005.post-12349614020795146972010-08-16T18:11:58.128+02:002010-08-16T18:11:58.128+02:00Pat,
Thanks for encouragement. I'll investiga...Pat,<br /><br />Thanks for encouragement. I'll investigate this relation further. c² is proportional to the area of the inner circle and t² is proportional to the area of the ring, which relates to the concentric rings described in another post: <a href="http://commonsensequantum.blogspot.com/2010/03/exhaustion-of-nested-squares-and-wallis.html" rel="nofollow">Exhaustion of nested squares and Wallis product</a>.Arjen Dijksmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09450431291713605237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-382677439644973005.post-48034399185146304822010-08-16T03:04:45.970+02:002010-08-16T03:04:45.970+02:00Very nice.... I like the "almost Pythagorean&...Very nice.... I like the "almost Pythagorean" idea and the fact that it is now a universal for all triangles.<br />Keep up the good workPat's Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15234744401613958081noreply@blogger.com